Phobos addition formal review: std.experimental.allocator

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 16:49:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 6/23/15 9:48 AM, extrawurst wrote:
>> I agree with Adam on this: "Just a quick concern, I don't 
>> think a
>> package.d should ever have anything except imports in it"
>> (see 
>> http://forum.dlang.org/post/qwatonmpnoyjsvzjpyjl@forum.dlang.org)
>
> What is the rationale? -- Andrei

My reasoning is simple : when `package.d` only contains public 
imports it allows to both use simple `import std.allocator` for 
those who want to get started quickly and pick only necessary 
imports for those who try optimizing build times / code clarity. 
Not doing that does not change anything for those who prefer 
`import std.allocator` but makes fine tuning of imports 
impossible. Thus former approach looks either equal or superior 
for all use cases.