std.uni.toLowerCase / .toUpperCase

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 24/06/15 01:17, Meta wrote:

> I really hate this naming scheme for functions that take lazy
> parameters. I still don't see why we don't do the (IMO) simplest and
> most intuitive thing and name them lazyToLower / lazyToUpper (or
> toLowerLazy / toUpperLazy). There is precedent with C#'s handling of
> async functions; for example, AccessTheWebAsync or GetStringAsync[1].
> Your proposed naming scheme seems like it's trying to be too "clever"
> and really just ends up causing unnecessary confusion. This is not Ruby.
> [1]https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh191443.aspx

+1

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg