std.path.setExt

[Wyatt via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:51:08 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 22:45:10 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
> wrote:
>
> Proposed new name: withExtension

I feel this fails the litmus you established before: "These 
functions have the same functionality, but one of them is eager, 
and the other is lazy. Can you guess which is which?"

I don't think I'd interpret these two names as having the same 
functionality in the first place.  I'd probably learn their 
equivalence completely by accident and only remember it by rote.

-Wyatt