auto ref is on the docket

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 17:47:51 UTC, Namespace wrote:
> On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 17:45:15 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 09:54:01 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
>> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 09:26:49 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
>>>> Simply give a possibility to "ref in" allowing use rvalues.
>>>
>>> That has already been rejected.
>>
>> Then we need to reconsider it. If that was several years ago, 
>> much has changed since then.
>>
>> Can you point me to that decision? Who made it, and on what 
>> basis? I can't find anything in the threads linked in 
>> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP36
>
> Read the thread: 
> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ylebrhjnrrcajnvtthtt@forum.dlang.org?page=1

Thanks. There was no link to this thread on the wiki page.

But I can't really find a definite rejection in it, in the sense 
of someone with authority saying "This DIP is rejected". The 
closest I can find is Andrei making some vague statements about 
what is proposed being a new feature (I don't know though whether 
this is an argument against the DIP), and it being unsafe because 
scope is not implemented (which was true at the time, but we now 
have DIP25 as a mechanism, albeit incomplete).

If you can find anything definite, can you please add it to the 
wiki page? I.e. officially rejected by NN on YYYY-MM-DD 
(including link), summary of the arguments for rejection, etc.