std.uni.toLowerCase / .toUpperCase

[Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 13:48:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> I prefer the noun naming scheme to the adjective naming scheme. 
> We really haven't been using adjectives much, and I think that 
> nouns make more sense, since what you're basically doing is 
> constructing an object. So, I'd just as soon not start using 
> adjectives for functions which return lazy ranges.

What do you think of asLowerCase? I heard no objections, this one 
actually sounds like proper English, and it's consistent with the 
only better name for "toAbsolutePath" that I could think of 
("asAbsolutePath").

> Also, the less that we have to rename the better, so if many of 
> the newer functions are already nouns, then it makes sense to 
> continue that (and it wouldn't surprise me if some of the newer 
> ones were in 2.067, in which case, it's likely too late to 
> change them unless they're particularly bad).

No, I'm looking at the diff of functions between 2.067 and 
master, and the only verb-noun names in 2.067 are "joiner" and 
"splitter".