Naming Voldemort Types
Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jun 25 19:11:16 PDT 2015
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 20:58:41 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 6/25/2015 11:54 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Result. No stuttering please. -- Andrei
>>
>
> Also, consider that the mangled name includes the parent
> algorithm name. Let's not make mangled names excessively large,
> even if it is an implementation problem that we should address
> on its own anyway.
It makes sense when we've been forced to make it so that the type
isn't actually Voldemort type (e.g. FilterResult is a private
struct outside of filter), but when it's actually a Voldemort
type, Result should work just fine.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list