std.experimental.testing PR review

[Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 13:32:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Just in case it wasn't clear : I will vote "no" on this 
> proposal as long as it features longish "readable" names like 
> "shouldEquals".

You'd rather `should!"=="`? I'm not sure which I'd prefer; the 
thing is that so far you're the only one strongly against it. The 
only other thing I heard was a question at DConf on why it wasn't 
`assertEquals` instead.

Atila