std.experimental.testing PR review

Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Jun 26 07:54:06 PDT 2015


On 26-Jun-2015 17:30, Atila Neves wrote:
> On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 13:32:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> Just in case it wasn't clear : I will vote "no" on this proposal as
>> long as it features longish "readable" names like "shouldEquals".
>
> You'd rather `should!"=="`? I'm not sure which I'd prefer; the thing is
> that so far you're the only one strongly against it. The only other
> thing I heard was a question at DConf on why it wasn't `assertEquals`
> instead.
>

FWIW I totally prefer should!"==" to shouldEquals.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list