auto ref is on the docket

[rsw0x via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 11:06:01 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
> On Sunday, 28 June 2015 at 07:36:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> It makes no sense to pass rvalues by ref. The ref has to refer 
>> to a memory location so that a pointer can be passed 
>> underneath the hood, and rvalues don't qualify for that.
>
> I strongly disagree with that. This is an implementation 
> detail. `ref` describes a specific semantic, namely that no 
> copying (observable by a postblit being called) takes place,

no, it means pass by reference.
this sounds like some convoluted C++ doublespeak definition.