Let's bikeshed std.experimental.testing assertions/checks/whatchamacallits

Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jun 30 12:45:27 PDT 2015


On 30/06/15 16:58, Atila Neves wrote:

> Yeah, I'm starting to think it might be better to delete `should.d` from
> my current PR, try to get the rest approved then work on where the
> community wants the fancy assertions to go. It's a shame though because
> I think it's a massively important piece of the whole thing. It's a
> night and day difference when a test fails.

Yeah, I agree, it would be a shame to not have these assertions.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list