DIP74 updated with new protocol for function calls

[Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d]

"Jacob Carlborg"  wrote in message news:mcv342$2c9t$1 at digitalmars.com...

> I already commented on that. Andrei said [1] he was fine with breaking 
> code for this feature. I don't understand why because it so easy to fix 
> with a compiler recognized UDA [2].

Because a compiler recognized UDA is an additional complication for 
something that is unlikely to be a problem for anyone.  Do you have code 
with methods named opAddRef?  No?  Me neither.