RCArray is unsafe

[Zach the Mystic via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 4 March 2015 at 09:06:01 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 3/4/2015 12:13 AM, deadalnix wrote:
>> The #1 argument for DIP25 compared to alternative proposal was 
>> its simplicity. I
>> assume at this point that we have empirical evidence that this 
>> is NOT the case.
>
> The complexity of a free list doesn't remotely compare to that 
> of adding an ownership system.

My reference safety system has ownership built in, more-or-less 
for free:

http://forum.dlang.org/post/offurllmuxjewizxedab@forum.dlang.org

See also my reply to deadalnix:

http://forum.dlang.org/post/oyaoibmwybzfkhhufpow@forum.dlang.org