A few notes on choosing between Go and D for a quick project

[w0rp via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 03:24:44 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 3/12/2015 5:20 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> * Golang: simple!
>
> D1 was the simple version of D. People wanted more.
>
> Java was originally sold as, and got a great of adoption 
> because, it was a C++ like language with all that annoying 
> complexity removed.
>
> There's no doubt about it, people like simple languages. We 
> should very much keep that in mind when evaluating proposals 
> for new features.

I'll never forget what Bjarne said about people wanting a "simple 
language." His response to "I want a simple language" was, "No, 
you don't!" Because it's always "I want it to be simple... with 
just this one extra little feature in it."

It was in his list of "Language Myths" in his talk at Lang-NEXT. 
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Lang-NEXT/Lang-NEXT-2014/Keynote