A few notes on choosing between Go and D for a quick project

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 3/13/15 3:34 AM, bearophile wrote:
> Ola Fosheim Grøstad:
>
>> Yes, but what is a "strict mode". I agree with most of what is said
>> about D and Go in the top post, but is there a market for yet another
>> high level language that isn't high level enough?
>
> "Strict mode" is a D2 with immutable+ at safe+pure by default, something
> like a "var" keyword to denote mutable values, no comma operator, static
> full tracking of memory ownership, less implicit casts (because now we
> have the safe int(x) sytnax), and few other small changes that make the
> language less bug prone and more strict.
>
> And I'd still like built-in tuple syntax in D.

That's a rather random collection - "strict" seems to be "D without the 
stuff bearophile dislikes". -- Andrei