A few notes on choosing between Go and D for a quick project
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Mar 14 02:44:35 PDT 2015
On Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 09:03:11 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 07:55 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via
>> On 3/13/15 6:45 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> > The removal of shared memory multi-threading in favour of
>> > using
>> > processes and channels should never be underestimated as a
>> > Really Good
>> > Thing™ that other native code languages (*) have failed to
>> > do anything
>> > about. Thus Go wins, others lose.
>> That's a marketing success as well. Go didn't "remove" shared
>> memory multi-threading, it just unrecommends it. That's quite
>> unremarkable from a programming language design standpoint,
>> but as discussed that's not always crucial for success. --
> I think you need to show a bit of Go code that uses threads to
> be able
> to back up that claim.
No, that is the classical "prove that god do not exist" trick.
This is up to Go to prove it is safe. Hint: it isn't.
More information about the Digitalmars-d