A few notes on choosing between Go and D for a quick project

Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Mar 14 07:29:23 PDT 2015

I suspect most of the reason these IDE vs editor debates even 
happen is because the editors by default don't do what IDEs do, 
but can. All you've mentioned is possible in Emacs and has been 
for basically forever.


On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 08:53:16 UTC, JN wrote:
> On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 06:58:59 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 17:20 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via 
>> Digitalmars-d
>> wrote:
>> […]
>>> - no good IDE
>> Not entirely true, there are Emacs, VIM, LiteIDE, and others 
>> for Go
>> development.
> Never heard of LiteIDE, but Emacs and VIM aren't really IDEs,
> they are just glorified text editors. When people say IDE, they
> not only mean the text editing part, but the management of the
> build process and visual debugging, including watches,
> breakpoints, step-by-step debugging etc.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list