A few notes on choosing between Go and D for a quick project

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 23:47:24 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 3/14/2015 3:19 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 19:48:14 UTC, Walter Bright 
>> wrote:
>>> The point is, with a library abstraction the core language 
>>> can be simplified.
>>> D's ability to create user defined literals largely ends the 
>>> pressure to make
>>> more complicated and specialized core language literals.
>> It makes it sounds like you don't know the spec about string 
>> literals.
>
> I know I don't know what you're driving at :-)

That we have a large number of string literals, in the core of 
the language, many of which could probably be language construct.