Phobos Documentation - call to action

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

The bad news: the Phobos documentation sux.

The good news: we can make things a lot better by just filling in blanks. For 
example, picking a function largely at random:

   http://dlang.org/phobos/std_uni.html#sicmp

There is no Params section, no Returns: section, and no See_Also section. Hence, 
I wrote a PR for it:

   https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3060

There's nothing clever about it, just filling in the blanks. If we all pitch in, 
we can substantially improve the documentation.

Some guidelines:

1. The sections Params, Returns, and See_Also need to be there. (Unless there 
are no parameters, or a void return.)

2. One PR per function being fixed.

3. Resist the urge to do more, stay focused simply on filling in the blanks, one 
PR per function, making things easy to review.