Enhancement: issue error on all public functions that are missing ddoc sections
Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Mar 19 13:43:46 PDT 2015
On Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 09:43:35 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> This is very popular in "enterprise" code, and there is a
> reason everybody hates it.
Garbage like this is why Harbored treats the "Returns:" section
as the summary when the summary is missing.
It's also the reason that D-Scanner's undocumented declaration
check skips functions whose name starts with "get" or "set".
More information about the Digitalmars-d