Enhancement: issue error on all public functions that are missing ddoc sections

Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Mar 19 15:05:03 PDT 2015

On 3/19/2015 2:40 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> And I'm sorry, but if most function require DDoc, your code probably sucks quite
> badly and some renaming should be considered.

I've never seen any code that self-documented "why".

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list