Enhancement: issue error on all public functions that are missing ddoc sections

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 3/19/2015 3:13 PM, Jeremy Powers via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> A valid reason for doing things like this is future-proof encapsulation.  You
> can change the internal foo to be something entirely different, and the external
> api never changes (assuming 'foo' is private).

That's why D has properties. Fields can be replaced with property functions.