Enhancement: issue error on all public functions that are missing ddoc sections

Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Mar 20 16:25:46 PDT 2015

On 3/19/2015 3:13 PM, Jeremy Powers via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> A valid reason for doing things like this is future-proof encapsulation.  You
> can change the internal foo to be something entirely different, and the external
> api never changes (assuming 'foo' is private).

That's why D has properties. Fields can be replaced with property functions.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list