Enhancement: issue error on all public functions that are missing ddoc sections

Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Mar 20 16:44:17 PDT 2015

On 3/19/2015 12:54 PM, w0rp wrote:
> I think this is a good idea. Even the most trivial looking function might not be
> so trivial looking to consumers of the API. Document everything. If you can't
> explain a function in a public API (where protected is also public), then why
> should it exist?

I consider all the times I have to look up the source code to some "trivial" 

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list