Enhancement: issue error on all public functions that are missing ddoc sections

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Mar 20 17:19:36 PDT 2015


On 3/19/15 5:08 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>
> Ok let's be clear. This kind of overpedantic commenting is a good thing
> in a public, widespread API, like phobos's. Especially since you can
> generate documentation from it, this is going to be googled for.
>
> That is very bad idea in the general case.

Makes sense. -- Andrei


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list