Enhancement: issue error on all public functions that are missing ddoc sections

deadalnix via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Mar 21 01:52:54 PDT 2015

On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 00:42:22 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 3/20/2015 5:17 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> They're useful to prevent writes to foo.
> That's true.
>> Also as Amaury mentioned they give the
>> implementer better options going forward. See debacle about 
>> C++'s std::pair's
>> "first" and "second". "Of course they needn't be functions!" 
>> said everybody to
>> the regret of future everybody. -- Andrei
> Fortunately, D has property functions.

That won't behave the same, because @property is not enforced 
properly, but this is hardly a new topic.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list