A reason to choose D over Go

[weaselcat via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 04:53:06 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 02:36:03 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
>> On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 02:32:38 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:44:32 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 01:24:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, 21 March 2015 at 23:49:26 UTC, Atila Neves 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> I actually think that there are two large categories of
>>>>>> programmers: those like writing the same loops over and 
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> again and those who use algorithms.
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree, at some point I learned that there is a huge 
>>>>> cultural distinction between C and C++ programmers.
>>>>
>>>> yes, the other main distinction are the people who correctly 
>>>> put the * next to the type because it's part of the type, or 
>>>> the wrong people who put it next to the variable name 
>>>> because they're heathens
>>>
>>> What is the type of b here ?
>>>
>>> int* a, b;
>>
>> int* because I don't use a language that's ruined by C baggage.
>
> You answer a comment about, quoting "C and C++ programmers". If 
> you don't understand what you are answering to, you probably 
> shouldn't.

yes, and I answered it with respect to D programmers.
the correct answer for C++ is: if you submit that as a PR, I'm 
going to hit you.