uniform tuple syntax

[ixid via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 18:12:03 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On 03/24/2015 03:11 PM, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
>> Anything going on with this? Been looking forward to seeing it 
>> for awhile.
>
> I think we should settle on a syntax and split DIP32 in a tuple 
> part and
> a pattern matching part.
> The proposal wasn't yet formally accepted, partly because we 
> wanted to
> wait, whether more needs come up. By now it's already 2 years 
> old and it
> still looks complete IMO.
>
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP32

What was the conclusion about parens tuples? They would be much 
prettier.