uniform tuple syntax

[Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d]

On 25/03/2015 5:13 p.m., Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 3/24/15 8:00 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>> On 25/03/2015 7:11 a.m., Martin Nowak wrote:
>>> On 03/24/2015 03:11 PM, Vlad Levenfeld wrote:
>>>> Anything going on with this? Been looking forward to seeing it for
>>>> awhile.
>>>
>>> I think we should settle on a syntax and split DIP32 in a tuple part and
>>> a pattern matching part.
>>> The proposal wasn't yet formally accepted, partly because we wanted to
>>> wait, whether more needs come up. By now it's already 2 years old and it
>>> still looks complete IMO.
>>>
>>> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP32
>>
>> There is one thing blatantly missing atleast to me.
>> Unpacking into function arguments.
>>
>> void myfunc(int x, string y) {
>>      // ...
>> }
>>
>> myfunc({1, "hi!"}.unpack);
>
> myfunc(tuple(1, "hi!").expand);
>
> Andrei

In that case, +1 on my vote for being complete.