Named unittests

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 3/30/15 2:59 PM, Panke wrote:
>>
>> I've implemented this in a library and I'm sure others have as well.
>> Are you sure, you want a language solution?
>
> Basic principle:
>
> ---
> unittest {
>
>      testCase("a testcase",
>      {
>          // actual test code here
>      });
> }
> ---

Looks a bit too much work.

> Testcase registers the structure and the runtime just runs the unittest
> as is does today and than calls all closures registered during the
> unittest. Makes this fully backward compatible.

Backward compatibility is not an issue seeing this is a pure addition.


Andrei