Named unittests

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 14:45:50 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
> But unittests already have 
> names(http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/b15e94000f15), so the only required 
> change is to allow the user to specify that name. This should 
> be much simpler than adding entirely new fields.

And does not really help. Of all metadata that one may want to 
attach to a test block, names are actually _least_ important in 
practice. It will be matter of time until Andrei creates new 
topic about adding descriptions to tests or way to mark flakey 
ones. Better to invest into something that scales at least a bit.