std.xml2 (collecting features)

w0rp via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun May 3 11:44:11 PDT 2015


On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 17:47:15 UTC, Joakim wrote:
> On Sunday, 3 May 2015 at 17:39:48 UTC, Robert burner Schadek 
> wrote:
>> std.xml has been considered not up to specs nearly 3 years 
>> now. Time to build a successor. I currently plan the following 
>> featues for it:
>>
>> - SAX and DOM parser
>> - in-situ / slicing parsing when possible (forward range?)
>> - compile time switch (CTS) for lazy attribute parsing
>> - CTS for encoding (ubyte(ASCII), char(utf8), ... )
>> - CTS for input validating
>> - performance
>>
>> Not much code yet, I'm currently building the performance test 
>> suite https://github.com/burner/std.xml2
>>
>> Please post you feature requests, and please keep the posts 
>> DRY and on topic.
>
> My request: just skip it.  XML is a horrible waste of space for 
> a standard, better D doesn't support it well, anything to 
> discourage it's use.  I'd rather see you spend your time on 
> something worthwhile.  If data formats are your thing, you 
> could help get Ludwig's JSON stuff in, or better yet, enable 
> some nice binary data format.

I agree that JSON is superior through-and-through, but legacy 
support matters, and XML is in many places. It's good to have a 
quality XML parsing library.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list