Making `object.opEquals' replaceable

[Manfred Nowak via Digitalmars-d]

Jonathan M Davis wrote:

> And why not just use another function instead of opEquals for 
> what you want?

Because the local `opEquals' _is_ the overload-function for `==' 
and `!='.

I guess that your "another function"-opinion holds for every form 
of overloading.

-manfred