std.parallelism equivalents for posix fork and multi-machine processing

[Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d]

"Laeeth Isharc"  wrote in message 
news:ejbhesbstgazkxnpvqsl at forum.dlang.org...

> Is there value to having equivalents to the std.parallelism approach that 
> works with processes rather than threads, and makes it easy to manage 
> tasks over multiple machines?
>
> I took a look at std.parallelism and it's beyond what I can do for now. 
> But it seems like this might be a useful project, and not one of 
> unmanageable difficulty...

Yes, there is enormous value.  It's just waiting for someone to do it.