std.allocator: nomenclature needed

Mike via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon May 18 19:21:39 PDT 2015


On Friday, 15 May 2015 at 03:27:15 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

>
> Also, I need two more good names: one for what's now called 
> "porcelain" - high-level typed interface for allocators

Would it be better to move the porcelain code into package.d so 
the nomenclature simply becomes `import std.allocator;`?

Mike



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list