Evaluation order of index expressions

[Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d]

"Timon Gehr"  wrote in message news:mjvtqm$17d8$1 at digitalmars.com...

> A related issue is that the rewrites documented at 
> http://dlang.org/operatoroverloading.html don't all preserve the order of 
> subexpressions. However, ideally, the order of evaluation would be 
> preserved.

As operator overloading is defined in terms of lowering to function calls, I 
think it's reasonable to decide the order of evaluation after the lowering. 
This will still be consistent across compilers and platforms.  Preserving 
the original order would require added complexity that I don't think is 
warranted.