Status of Deimos bindings

[Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d]

On 26/05/2015 9:33 a.m., FreeSlave wrote:
> What's the current status of Deimos? I don't think that this kind of
> bindings is useless, since not everyone always wants dynamic bindings.
> E.g. for the sake of simplicity or static linking. Actually Walter even
> fixes issues in these bindings time by time, so I guess the idea is
> still alive. But I see some problems now:
>
> 1. Some of Deimos bindings are not made into the dub packages. Also not
> all of those which have dub.json (or package.json) are presented in dub
> registry.
> 2. No consistency on names. There're repos named with lib prefix and
> without it either.
> 3. I could not find information on how to propose new binding to Deimos.
> Currently we have some bindings in dub registry which are not in
> D-Programming-Deimos. Would be better to keep these things in the same
> place. One can filter dub registry by choosing the Development library
> -> D language bindings -> Deimos header-only binding, but some bindings
> (for example, flac) are not assigned to this section, so you will not
> see them.
>
> Thoughts?

Really what needs to happen is getting Derelict-Util into phobos.
And some CTFE magic to create static bindings from those (if wanted).

 From there its just port the derelict libraries and deimos ones to it 
and PR for phobos.

Perhaps bindings shouldn't go through the review process. After all 
there isn't exactly bugs that can be introduced from it.