Second CT-Parameter of isRange Predicates
Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Nov 3 00:37:20 PST 2015
On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 03:26:47 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> On Monday, 2 November 2015 at 15:00:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
>> On 11/02/2015 09:43 AM, Nordlöw wrote:
>>> On Monday, 2 November 2015 at 14:43:00 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
>>>> On Monday, 2 November 2015 at 14:33:44 UTC, Andrei
>>>> Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>>> Sent an ICBM its way. -- Andrei
>>>> Why not extend existing traits with a second `E`-parameter
>>>> instead of
>>>> adding a new one?
>>> I think it's very well worth it in terms of expressability.
>> I'd say it's a minor convenience.
> I'm actually a bit surprised at the suggestion, since I would
> have expected most code to either not care what the ElementType
> was or to have to test something about it other than simply
> testing for an exact type.
Am I the only one who ever writes `int` or `Struct` in a
More information about the Digitalmars-d