DIP 57: static foreach

[Shammah Chancellor via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 00:23:59 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 11/3/15 3:12 PM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
>>>
>>> So, I think that static foreach *cannot* support break and 
>>> continue as
>>> same as foreach with tuples.
>>>
>>> Kenji Hara
>>
>> Ditto.  This needs `static continue` and `static break`.  
>> Without this
>> functionality, the control flow in `static foreach` becomes 
>> very unwieldy.
>
> There's no reason technical or otherwise to require "static" 
> with continue/break in static foreach. -- Andrei

I'm not sure that I agree with you.  However, in the latest DMD 
it appears that named break/continues work with foreach over 
tuples now.   So, I'll rescind my statement regarding separating 
compile-time control flow vs runtime control flow.

-Shammah