Is D so powerfull ??

[TheFlyingFiddle via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 10:22:44 UTC, FreeSlave wrote:
> On Saturday, 7 November 2015 at 14:49:05 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
>> basically you don't have technical reasons not to use D :D
>
> What about the lack of proper support for dynamic libraries on 
> Windows and OSX? I mean, GC merging is still not implemented, 
> right?

Pretty sure gc merging is done via the gc proxy in dlls/shared 
libraries. But there are lot's of other problems. Mainly that 
Phobos cannot be dynamically loaded (or is this fixed?) Last time 
i tried throwing exceptions did not work either. Also the export 
problems on windows have not really been fixed (see 
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP45). Still I have used DLL's sucessfully 
for reloading plugins, it can be done but it's really a pain to 
use as it stands now.