Why does opCall disable struct-literal syntax?

[rcorre via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 23:54:52 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 23:26:44 UTC, rcorre wrote:
>> Is this just a technical limitation, or is there some other 
>> reasoning?
>
> Old bug/misdesign inherited from old D before there were struct 
> constructors. It really should be the rest of the way fixed, 
> but non-static and static methods, including opCall, are still 
> not properly distinguished by the D language.
>
> Type.staticFunction(); // compiles, used to be done to kinda 
> mimic constructors before they were there
>
> obj.staticFunction(); // also compiles, which means a change at 
> this point would be a breaking change

That seems like the opposite of what's happening here. It's not a 
static member being invoked on an instance, but an instance 
member being invoked on the type.

Type.memberFunction() should never be possible, right?