RFC in Comparison between Rust, D and Go
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Nov 9 11:30:42 PST 2015
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 15:29:44 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
> On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 14:13:45 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
>> Yet another shallow language comparison that needs to be
> Besides the author's obvious bias, the only thing in there that
> is factually wrong is his statement that Rust provides the same
> modeling power as C++ (lack of OOP). But other than that,
> nothing really jumps out at me as being plain incorrect.
There is plenty wrong with it. For instance, he mention that C++
and D are not attractive coming from C because of the complexity,
but somehow this doesn't apply to Rust. The claim is so ludicrous
I have hard time to believe that one can make it seriously.
Rust is way more complex than C. It's not even close.
More information about the Digitalmars-d