Referencer

[HaraldZealot via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 20 November 2015 at 19:53:23 UTC, HaraldZealot wrote:
> On Friday, 20 November 2015 at 18:48:51 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
>> On Friday, 20 November 2015 at 18:23:57 UTC, HaraldZealot 
>> wrote:
>>
>> You say ranges are pass-by-value, but that's not entirely 
>> true. Ranges themselves can be classes, or be made references 
>> via std.range.refRange. Range elements can be made lvalues by 
>> using ref functions [1].
>
> Possible refRange is what I was looking for. Thanks.
>

Unfortunately current RefRange and refRange implementation 
doesn't work with out-range :( Ridiculous, because reference 
semantic for out-range even is more important.

So I'm found myself at fork point which from my next work for 
community is better:

* add support for out range in `RefRange`
* or implement further my universal referencer?