I hate new DUB config format

[BLM768 via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 at 22:20:39 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
> It's more like "Do this, no need to argue". There's really no 
> need, and we're arguing too much over too little. -- Andrei

Is anyone else having flashbacks to Phobos vs. Tango?

In this case, as much as I like how the SDL syntax is more 
readable (at least to me), the history of Phobos shows that 
standardization wins in most cases. I don't know if we want to 
yank the syntax right out of DUB, but we could at least deprecate 
it until things settle out.

Or, hey, we could use XML. ;)