I hate new DUB config format

[Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d]

V Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:43:52 +0000
Chris via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> napsáno:

> On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 12:29:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
> wrote:
> > On 2015-11-25 11:17, Suliman wrote:  
> >> [...]  
> >
> > BTW, why was not TOML [1] chosen? I know it was discussed but I 
> > can't remember why SDL was preferred. I think TOML is more 
> > widely used than SDL [2]. GitLib CI multi runner is also using 
> > it.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/toml-lang/toml
> > [2] https://github.com/toml-lang/toml#projects-using-toml  
> 
> TOML looks nice, _but_ it's version 0.4.0. We cannot afford to 
> maintain a parser for a format that hasn't "settled down" yet.

Ok, but we can afford to mantain a parser for a dead format?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Simple_Declarative_Language