I hate new DUB config format

CraigDillabaugh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Nov 26 14:27:06 PST 2015


On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 20:56:04 UTC, Bruno Medeiros 
wrote:
> On 26/11/2015 12:53, Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> V Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:43:52 +0000
>> Chris via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> napsáno:
>>
>>> On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 12:29:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
>>> wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> TOML looks nice, _but_ it's version 0.4.0. We cannot afford to
>>> maintain a parser for a format that hasn't "settled down" yet.
>>
>> Ok, but we can afford to mantain a parser for a dead format?
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Simple_Declarative_Language
>>
>
> BAM!! *Daniel drops mike, walks way*
>
>
> (well said)

Isn't it easier to maintain a parser for a dead format than a 
living one? You know it won't change ... after all, its dead!


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list