D 2015/2016 Vision?

[Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 8 October 2015 at 15:59:23 UTC, bitwise wrote:
> Again, it's much easier to be careful about this when the 
> author's intent is baked into the class.

That may be, but my point was that it doesn't actually guarantee 
that the object is going to be destroyed determinstically. That's 
going to require that the programmer using the object know that 
it's designed to be destroyed deterministically and program 
accordingly. Having it be easier for the programmer to figure out 
whether an object was designed that way is definitely a plus, but 
it doesn't make it so that they don't have to worry about it.

- Jonathan M Davis