Moving back to .NET

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 8 October 2015 at 16:25:09 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> Where do you think is a limit to applicability of a 
> turing-complete language?

?

> Pointers are of little use for a type that is always reference 
> type.

You can have many different types of references.

> Make them not compile? @nogc does exactly that.

No, make the features work well without GC or change them.

> Reducing GC usage and emscripten backend are actionable if you 
> want to work on them.

Changing the language is not "actionable" without creating a fork.

Regarding Emscripten, I don't see much value in spending so much 
work on getting something that isn't good enough to work. A 
higher level approach is needed for compact code gen. Possibly 
also language adjustments.