Voting for std.experimental.testing

Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Oct 11 20:19:01 PDT 2015


On 12/10/15 4:11 PM, stewart wrote:
> On Monday, 12 October 2015 at 02:50:37 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> That's not quite what I meant. It doesn't need to wait. As long as the
>> implementation stays private and is not exposed in anyway, it is fine.
>> We can rewrite it to use new functionality of Phobos at a later point.
>> We just need to acknowledge that it will need to happen at this
>
> [snip]
>
> Sorry for misquoting :)
>
> I would still argue the additional maintenance and future work isn't
> worth it for coloured text. Plain text output is fine until Phobos has
> better colour support.
>
> bye,
> stewart

I'll leave that up to the author to decide :)
And anyway while its in std.experimental, the goal is to get the 
implementation up to what the abstraction is meant to be. So it doesn't 
have to be perfect, but it does need to be a good show case which this is.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list