DIP74 - where is at?

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 10/12/15 2:39 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 10/11/2015 10:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> 1. You say that DIP25 is a failure. More so, you demand that is admitted
>> without evidence.
>
> FWIW, DIP25 is insufficiently formal and/or incorrect.

That I agree with. We need to get a lot better at making precise DIPs.

> I have been able to find those holes in the implementation pretty
> quickly (I'll also put them to bugzilla):

Thanks. That's great work!


Andrei