D 2015/2016 Vision?

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 8 October 2015 at 14:05:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> Maybe, but having classes be value generally makes no sense, 
> because you can't use polymorphism with value types.

If it doesn't make sense for reference types to be value types, 
then your suggestion to use structs (value types) to implement 
reference types doesn't make sense either.