D 2015/2016 Vision?

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 12 October 2015 at 07:39:30 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 October 2015 at 14:05:07 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
> wrote:
>> Maybe, but having classes be value generally makes no sense, 
>> because you can't use polymorphism with value types.
>
> If it doesn't make sense for reference types to be value types, 
> then your suggestion to use structs (value types) to implement 
> reference types doesn't make sense either.

It does make sense. You have the value type that do the reference 
counting, and a reference type that is reference counted.

That is good separation of concerns.